“At the set time which God had spoken,” Isaac
was born to Sarah. As God had commanded, Abraham circumcised Isaac when he was
eight days old. He grew from infancy to boyhood.
The future must have looked quite secure to Abraham and Sarah. God had kept His
promise precisely as He said that He would. Isaac was a growing boy. The heir
through which God could keep all His promises was a part of the family. After
having received a child in their old age, they could look at the rest of God’s
promises as inevitable. The difficult, trying, doubt-ridden years were now a
thing of the past.
Then God again spoke to Abraham. It was a brief, incomprehensible revelation
containing a single instruction with no explanation and no assurances. “Abraham,
take Isaac, the son you love, to the land of Moriah and offer him as a burnt
offering on a mountain I will show you.” That unbelievable instruction was the
total extent of God’s message.
There are many ways in which Abraham could have reacted to God’s message. (1) He
could have doubted that it was God who was speaking to him. God never before had
required human sacrifice. God always had given him assurances and encouragement.
Both the request and the nature of the message was out of character with God.
(2) He could have set aside the request because it did not make sense. It
violated every aspect of God’s promises given in Ur and renewed in Haran and in
Canaan. It was a seeming violation of the covenant itself. God had promised him
a son, and God specifically said Isaac was that son of promise. God had made it
quite clear that Isaac was the heir. It was through Isaac that the descendants
were to come. It was the descendants who were to possess Canaan. Through the
descendants the universal blessing was to come. Without Isaac none of that could
happen. (3) He could have agreed to obey after God gave an explanation. Since
God always had given Abraham assurances, Abraham could have declared obedience
was reasonable only if God explained how the covenant would be kept if Isaac
died. Yet, Abraham reacted in none of these ways.
Abraham’s reaction to God’s request exceeded the merely remarkable. (1) He rose
up early the next morning (v. 3). He did not delay the sacrifice by taking his
time. He did not take “one last day to remember” with his son. (2) He saddled a
donkey for himself and selected two young men to accompany and to assist them on
the journey (v. 3). He wanted to make the journey as quickly as possible. (3) He
cut the wood for the sacrifice, and he took the wood and fire with him (v. 5).
He made full preparation prior to the journey to complete the sacrifice
promptly. (4) When he neared the place of offering, he ordered the young
servants to stay behind (v. 5). He made certain that no one would interfere with
the completion of God’s request.
The entire situation is almost too painful to envision, here was a man over 100
years old with the son for whose birth he had yearned for over 25 years. He
loved Isaac more than he loved his own life. Isaac represented all of the hopes
and the dreams of Abraham’s entire life. For three days Abraham traveled with
his son knowing that every step moved them closer to Isaac’s death. For three
days he watched and listened to the son he loved knowing that these were the
last days, that he was preparing to kill him.
If the journey was heart rending, how much more painful were those final minutes
together? When they reached the mountain, Abraham had Isaac carry the wood for
his own sacrifice while Abraham carried the knife and the fire. Is it not
remarkable that Abraham could even speak to answer when Isaac asked, “Where is
the lamb for the sacrifice?” Can the thoughts of Abraham’s heart, can the surge
of his emotions be imagined as they built the altar and laid the wood? What kind
of faith is it which would move a man to tie up the son he loves more than life
itself, to place that son helplessly on the altar, and to look upon that son’s
face as he raised the knife to end the boy’s life? What did Isaac think or say
as his father placed him on the altar? What look was upon Isaac's face as he
watched his father raise the knife?
What kind of faith could function in such a manner? The faith which believed
that God, regardless of circumstances, would keep His promises. The faith which
believed that even the death of Isaac could not stop God from keeping His
covenant. The faith which trusted God so implicitly that it would obey God even
when God’s request could not be understood. That was the faith which God
reckoned for righteousness.
Only the instruction of an angel stopped Abraham. In God’s sight, Abraham
sacrificed Isaac. Because of Abraham's faith, God again affirmed the promises of
the covenant.
Why did God make that request of Abraham? The response, “God wished to prove
Abraham,” is correct but likely unclear. What was God proving? Had not Abraham
already proven his confidence in God many times? What need was there for further
proof after Abraham had left Ur and Haran, after he had left his family, after
he had wandered in Canaan, and after he had trusted God to give him an heir? Was
God being excessive in His testing? Was God unsure of Abraham’s trust or
loyalty? What specifically did God hope to accomplish by this episode?
First, it must be understood that God was not seeking Abraham’s failure. God was
vindicating Abraham’s faith. This incident occurred not because God doubted
Abraham, but because God had confidence in Abraham. God was providing Abraham
the opportunity to establish the most complete relationship with God possible.
That relationship is possible only through the maturing of the faith reckoned
for righteousness.
Second, God wanted Abraham to make it evident that the faith reckoned for
righteousness still characterized his life. The point of Isaac’s sacrifice can
be seen in two simple questions: did Abraham place his faith in the fact that
Isaac was alive? or did Abraham place his faith in the God who gave him Isaac?
The faith of righteousness dies when the believer places his trust in the things
which God has given rather than continuing his trust in the God who gave. It is
possible to place one’s trust in God the Promiser before the promises are
received, and later to replace one’s trust in the blessing which has been
received. When one trusts the material blessings God has given rather than the
God who gave the material blessings, the faith of righteousness dies. When one
trusts the strength which God has developed in his life rather than in the God
who gave the strength, the faith of righteousness dies. When one trusts the
wisdom God has made possible rather than the God who authored the wisdom, the
faith of righteousness dies.
After the birth and development of Isaac, Abraham easily could have placed his
trust in the fact that Isaac was alive, was his heir, and could be the source of
all the anticipated blessings. Had Abraham done that, the faith reckoned for
righteousness would have been dead. Abraham’s confidence and trust had to remain
where it long had been—in God the promise keeper. Did Abraham trust God because
he knew God kept His word? If Isaac were dead, would Abraham’s trust in God and
His promises remain unshaken? Or, was Abraham’s confidence in God now limited to
Isaac’s life and well-being? Could God keep His promises with or without Isaac,
or could God keep His promises only if Isaac lived?
Abraham clearly proved that his life continued to be ruled by the faith which
God could reckon for righteousness. It was God and God alone Abraham trusted.
The God who gave him Isaac would keep His promises even if Isaac died. Isaac’s
death would be no barrier to God fulfilling His covenant. It was because of such
faith that God regarded Abraham a righteous man.
Abraham was quite an obedient man. So notable are his acts of obedience that he
easily could have been declared the symbol of obedience. Leaving Ur and Haran,
wandering as a foreigner in the land of Canaan for many years, and the
willingness to sacrifice Isaac rank among the great acts of obedience of all
ages and generations. Yet, Abraham is not the symbol of obedience.
Abraham is the symbol of faith. It is significant that a man of great obedience
is the symbol of faith. There is not and never has been a conflict between
obedience and faith. The two are so interdependent that either is meaningless
and valueless without the other.
Abraham’s faith relationship with God declares an ageless truth which is as
alive today as it was in Abraham’s lifetime.
The means of Abraham being righteous before God and the means of a Christian
being righteous before God are one and the same. The obedient Abraham did not
achieve righteousness before God through his obedient acts. The obedient Abraham
was accepted as being righteous by God because of his faith. It was Abraham’s
ability to trust God’s promises which allowed God to accept him as a righteous
man. That fact must be understood clearly, and Abraham’s life can be the basis
of that understanding.
1. Discuss Abraham and Sarah’s probable
feelings about God and their future after Isaac’s birth.
2. What did God command Abraham to do with
Isaac?
3. Discuss some of the ways Abraham could have
reacted to God’s instruction.
4. State specifically how his faith of
righteousness did respond to God’s instruction.
5. Discuss as many difficult, heart-rending
moments as you can envision which must have occurred between the time Abraham
awoke after the vision and the time he placed Isaac on the altar.
6. Why is God’s request of Abraham difficult
to understand?
7. Was God seeking Abraham’s failure? Explain
your answer.
8. What purpose was God’s request for Isaac’s
sacrifice to serve in Abraham’s life?
9. What does this incident teach us about
Abraham’s faith of righteousness?
10. What is the central lesson to be learned in Abraham about faith?
Discuss ways the faith of righteousness might be
put to the test in the life of a Christian today.
Link to a summary of other books by David
Chadwell
Link to
David Chadwell Home Page